Topic: measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3980

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Dorthey.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Dorthey Anchor
la · 1993
green “measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment” 61
2 State v. Young
lactapp · 1995
green “while a defendant's record of nonviolent offenses may play a role in a sentencing judge's determination that a minimum sentence is too long, it cannot be the only reason, or even the major reason, for declaring such a sentence excessive.” 6
3 State v. Lobato
la · 1992
green “a sentence is grossly disproportionate if, when the crime and punishment are considered in light of the harm done to society, it shocks the sense of justice.” 6
4 State v. Bell
lactapp · 1998
green “trial court may not depart from the legislatively mandated minimum simply because of some subjective impression or feeling about the defendant.” 5
5 State v. Harbor
lactapp · 2002
green “exceptional, which ... means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature's failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense and the circumstances of the case.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check