2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jacobs v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacobs v. State Anchor | green | “in sum, the state must show a rational factfinder could have found appellant had no intention of fulfilling his obligation under the agreement, and his promise to perform was 'merely a ruse to accomplish theft by deception.” | 4 |
| 2 | Baker v. State | green | “a claim based upon malfeasance in connection with a contract requires proof of the false pretext or fraud in order to become a viable criminal prosecution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.