3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re GAT.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re GAT Anchor | green | “nowhere in the amended motion for new trial did the respondent, ford motor company, state that the evidence supporting the jury answers to any specific special issue was either insufficient or against the great weight of the credible evidence” | 3 |
| 2 | Darryl v. Ford Motor Company | green | “nowhere in the amended motion for new trial did the respondent, ford motor company, state that the evidence supporting the jury answers to any specific special issue was either insufficient or against the great weight of the credible evidence” | 3 |
| 3 | McDonald v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co. | green | “the insured does not raise in the court of civil appeals the point of 'insufficient evidence' to support the jury findings or the point that the findings are against 'the great weight and preponderance' of the credible evidence” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.