2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krajsa v. Keypunch, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krajsa v. Keypunch, Inc. Anchor | green | “an at will employee may be terminated for good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all” | 5 |
| 2 | Hunger v. Grand Central Sanitation | green | “threatens the clear mandates of public policy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.