2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na Llc Anchor | green | “hether a defendant can establish that federal jurisdiction exists and the 25 question of when the thirty-day time period begins are not two sides of the same coin.” | 3 |
| 2 | Nicholas Shoner v. Carrier Corporation | green | “although the mmwa is a 14 federal statute, federal courts do not have jurisdiction over an mmwa claim if the amount 15 in controversy is less than 50,000.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.