2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Antone v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antone v. State Anchor | green | “to elicit the individual and personal view of the witness.” | 4 |
| 2 | Alvarado v. State | green | “a witness invades the jury's exclusive province when that witness gives his or her personal views of the credibility of another witness.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.