2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sykes v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sykes v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp. Anchor | green | “does not authorize a plaintiff to add claims against different parties that present entirely different factual and legal issues.” | 5 |
| 2 | Courthouse News Service v. George Schaefer | green | “rule 20 permits joinder of 'all reasonably related claims for relief . . . against different parties.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.