2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mulcahy v. Verhines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mulcahy v. Verhines Anchor | green | “the burden is on the party claiming a prescriptive easement to show by satisfactory proof that the use of the defendant's property was of such a character and continued for such a length of time that it ripened into a prescriptive easement.” | 5 |
| 2 | West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. v. Lakeland Investments | green | “permissive use of property, regardless of the length of the use, will not result in an easement by prescription.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.