2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ragan v. Burnett.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ragan v. Burnett Anchor | green | “while substantial questions have been raised about the validity of the absentee ballots, the court concludes that there is insufficient evidence to discard the entirety of the absentee ballots.” | 4 |
| 2 | McClendon v. Hodges | green | “if the number of invalid ballots would be sufficient to change the result if they had been cast for the minority, then the election should be set aside upon the ground that it could not be determined with certainty that the result . . . represented the will of the majority.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.