2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lombardo v. Revlon, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lombardo v. Revlon, Inc. Anchor | green | “we may not substitute our own factfinding for that of the judge of compensation even if we were inclined to do so.” | 5 |
| 2 | Ramos v. M & F FASHIONS, INC. | green | “to the factual findings made by a workers' compensation judge” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.