2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Maine v. Samuel Sanchez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Maine v. Samuel Sanchez Anchor | neutral | “when determining whether the record contained enough evidence to support a criminal defendant's conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether the fact-finder could rationally find every element of the offense beyond a reasonable d…” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Mishne | green | “evidence of graham's distorted perception that the child was in danger also tended to confirm the court's finding that graham acted with the conscious object of removing the child from danger by taking him home.''); state v. mishne, 427 a.2d 450, 455 (me. 1981) (stating that "ev…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.