2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re TF.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re TF Anchor | green | “in determining what is in the best interests of the children, the court is required to look . . . to the totality of the evidence.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re ALH | green | “lack of commitment to complete the actions necessary to preserve the parent-child relationship.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.