2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Raess.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Raess Anchor | green | “the raising of such a defense necessarily constitutes an admission by the defendant that he committed the crime for which he is being prosecuted” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Gargani | green | “when considering the sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court does not retry the defendant.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.