2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Myers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Myers Anchor | green | “bsent a request for a limiting instruction, evidence admitted as relevant for one purpose is deemed relevant for others.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Myers | green | “bsent a request for a limiting instruction, evidence admitted as relevant for one purpose is deemed relevant for others.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.