Topic: rule 403 favors the admission of relevant evidence and carr… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4036

11 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 81 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gallo v. State.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Gallo v. State Anchor
texcrimapp · 2007
green “rule 403 favors the admission of relevant evidence and carries a presumption that relevant evidence will be more probative than prejudicial.” 15
2 Kelly v. State
texcrimapp · 1992
green “is sufficiently reliable and relevant to help the jury in reaching accurate results.” 15
3 Kelly v. State
texcrimapp · 1992
green “(a) the underlying scientific theory must be valid; (b) the technique applying the theory must be valid; and (c) the technique must have been properly applied on the occasion in question.” 11
4 Gallo v. State
texcrimapp · 2007
green “the admissibility of a photograph is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.” 8
5 Blake v. State
texcrimapp · 1998
green “a person is an accomplice if there is sufficient evidence connecting them to the criminal offense as a blameworthy participant.” 7
6 Winston v. State
texapp · 2002
green “since interpretation of a dog's reaction to a scent lineup is based upon training and experience, and not scientific method, we apply the less rigorous nenno test in this case.” 5
7 Smith v. State
texapp · 2009
green “the cumulative force of the evidence” 4
8 Smith v. State
texapp · 2009
green “was aware that guns were missing from her house and that the victims had been shot before that information was officially released to her” 4
9 Goff v. State
texcrimapp · 1996
green “a trial court may charge on the law of parties where there is no such allegation in the indictment.” 4
10 Yost v. State
texapp · 2007
green “no evidence outside the testimony of accomplices” 4
11 Gamez v. State
texcrimapp · 1987
green “if the evidence is clear that the witness is not an accomplice witness, no charge need be given to the jury either that the witness is an accomplice witness as a matter of law or in the form of a fact issue whether the witness is an accomplice witness.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check