2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC Anchor | green | “silence in a statute regarding a particular topic does not render the statute unclear or ambiguous unless the statute is susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Gaiovnik | green | “when interpreting statutes, we do not examine different provisions in isolation.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.