2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re RC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re RC Anchor | green | “our task is to determine whether there is substantial evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact could find, by clear and convincing evidence, that the minor is adoptable. the appellant has the burden of showing there is no evidence of a sufficiently substantial nature to su…” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re GM | green | “a child's current caretaker may be designated as a prospective adoptive parent if the child has lived with the caretaker for at least six months, the caretaker currently expresses a commitment to adopt the child, and the caretaker has taken at least one step to facilitate the ad…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.