2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bianco v. California Highway Patrol.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bianco v. California Highway Patrol Anchor | green | “the statement in buhl that consumer compliance with the state law only requires the consumer to wear a helmet bearing the dot self-certification sticker does not apply when a helmet has been shown not to conform with federal standards and the consumer has actual knowledge of thi…” | 6 |
| 2 | Buhl v. Hannigan | green | “only that the consumer wear a helmet bearing a certification of compliance.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.