2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ferranti v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ferranti v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms Anchor | green | “in assessing the reasonableness of a search, a court is not guided by whether the search actually uncovered every document or whether the search was exhaustive.” | 5 |
| 2 | Gutman v. U.S. Department of Justice | green | “by providing the requester with a vaughn index, adequately describing each withheld document and explaining the exemption's relevance.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.