2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Schaller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Schaller Anchor | green | “formal inquiry is not always essential where the defendant otherwise states his reasons for dissatisfaction on the record.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Schaller | green | “formal inquiry is not always essential where the defendant otherwise states his reasons for dissatisfaction on the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.