2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Luis Garcia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Luis Garcia Anchor | green | “pleaded guilty, admitted to significant relevant conduct, and provided a 'candid and full unmasking' of the methods she used for the charged and relevant conduct.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Schuster, Matthew R. | green | “a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.