2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hodge v. US Security Associates, Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hodge v. US Security Associates, Inc Anchor | green | “if it conforms to the law, and if competent, material, and substantial evidence supports it.” | 4 |
| 2 | Braska v. Challenge Manufacturing Co. | green | “the circuit court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo and its factual findings are reviewed for clear error.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.