2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Kelly.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Kelly Anchor | green | “need only be reasonable and possible;” | 5 |
| 2 | Gupta v. Deputy Director of Division of Employment & Training | green | “a person's knowledge, intent, or any other state of mind is rarely susceptible of proof by direct evidence, but rather is a matter of proof by inference from all the facts and circumstances in the case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.