2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robinson v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (5-10-2005).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robinson v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (5-10-2005) Anchor | green | “when a litigant receives the relief sought before the completion of the lawsuit” | 4 |
| 2 | Lingo v. Ohio Central Railroad, Inc., Unpublished Decision (5-9-2006) | green | “they involve no actual genuine, live controversy, the decision of which can definitely affect existing legal relations.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.