2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Masoud Sharif v. United Airlines, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Masoud Sharif v. United Airlines, Inc. Anchor | green | “employer intent . . . is relevant.” | 5 |
| 2 | Arlene Fry v. Rand Construction Corporation | green | “does not prevent 'an employer from terminating an employee for poor performance, misconduct, or insubordinate behavior.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.