2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Hoffman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Hoffman Anchor | green | “the family law equivalent of the death penalty.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re L.M.R. | green | “r.c. 2151.414(b) establishes a two-pronged analysis that the juvenile court must apply when ruling on a motion for permanent custody.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.