2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Anchor | green | “on appeal, we engage in a de novo review from a trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to dismiss filed pursuant to rule 4:6-2(e).” | 4 |
| 2 | Rezem Family Associates, LP v. Borough of Millstone | green | “on appeal, we engage in a de novo review from a trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to dismiss filed pursuant to rule 4:6-2(e).” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.