2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re F.S..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re F.S. Anchor | green | “even if there is sufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's decision, an appellate court may nevertheless reverse a permanent custody judgment if it finds the judgment to be against the manifest weight of the evidence.” | 5 |
| 2 | In re M.G. | green | “before a natural parent's constitutionally protected liberty interest in the care and custody of their child may be terminated, the state is required to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the statutory standards for permanent custody have been met.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.