3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Piatnitsky.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Piatnitsky Anchor | green | “the test as to whether a suspect's invocation of his right to remain silent was unequivocal is an objective one, asking whether 'a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement' to be an invocation of miranda rights.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. I.B. | green | “the test as to whether a suspect's invocation of his right to remain silent was unequivocal is an objective one, asking whether 'a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement' to be an invocation of miranda rights.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. I.B. | green | “whether 'a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement' to be an invocation of miranda rights.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.