2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cuervo v. Sorenson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuervo v. Sorenson Anchor | green | “section 1983 allows an individual to sue a government actor in his individual capacity for violating her constitutional rights and recover money damages from resulting injuries that the actor caused by his violation.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mohamed v. Jones | green | “when the supreme court decided bivens, it created a claim for constitutional violations by federal officials.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.