4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Turner v. Burnside.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turner v. Burnside Anchor | green | “this process is analogous to judgment on the pleadings under federal rule of civil procedure 12(c).” | 22 |
| 2 | JerMichael Pearson v. Warden Cedric Taylor | green | “at the second step, the court is permitted to make factual findings to resolve the issue of exhaustion.” | 22 |
| 3 | William A. White v. William Berger, Sr. | green | “a district court may properly consider facts outside of the pleadings to resolve a factual dispute regarding exhaustion where the factual dispute does not decide the merits and the parties have a sufficient opportunity to develop the record.” | 22 |
| 4 | Perttu v. Richards | green | “intertwined with the merits of a claim protected by the seventh amendment,” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.