2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Foley v. Connelie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foley v. Connelie Anchor | green | “by a showing of some rational relationship between the interest sought to be protected and the limiting classification.” | 4 |
| 2 | Sugarman v. Dougall | green | “go to the heart of representative government.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.