2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fieger v. Cox.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fieger v. Cox Anchor | green | “(1) whether the underlying proceedings constitute an ongoing judicial proceeding, (2) whether the proceedings implicate an important state interest, and (3) whether there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceedings to raise a constitutional challenge.” | 4 |
| 2 | Edward A. Zak and Charlotte Zak v. Anthony Pilla | green | “these traditional domestic relations issues qualify as important state issues under the second element of younger.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.