3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of Works.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of Works Anchor | green | “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 52 |
| 2 | Joseph Serfecz and First Chicago Trust v. Jewel Food Stores | green | “must present sufficient evidence to show the existence of each element of its case on which it will bear the burden at trial.” | 16 |
| 3 | Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of Works | green | “that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.