2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “whether public access plays a significant role in the functioning of the particular process in question” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re Gabapentin Patent Litigation | green | “specifically, the party seeking protection must demonstrate that the material contains the type of information that courts will protect and that there is good cause for continued application of an existing order.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.