2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Juster Associates v. City Of Rutland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juster Associates v. City Of Rutland Anchor | green | “merely by considering the contents of the pleadings,” | 4 |
| 2 | Gonzalez v. Apfel | green | “in many cases, a treating source's medical opinion will be entitled to the greatest weight and should be adopted, even if it does not meet the test for controlling weight.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.