5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re CH.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re CH Anchor | green | “in general, if a parent fails to request other services at the proper time, the parent waives the issue and may not later challenge it at the termination proceeding.” | 25 |
| 2 | In the Interest of L.M. | green | “parents have a responsibility to object when they claim the nature or extent of services is inadequate.” | 20 |
| 3 | In Re CH | green | “if, however, a parent is not satisfied with dhs's response to a request for other services, the parent must come to the court and present this challenge.” | 12 |
| 4 | In Re AAG | green | “if, however, a parent is not satisfied with dhs's response to a request for other services, the parent must come to the court and present this challenge.” | 11 |
| 5 | In the Interest of L.M. | green | “in general, if a parent fails to request other services at the proper time, the parent waives the issue and may not later challenge it at the termination proceeding.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.