2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, and Goss Graphics Systems, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, and Goss Graphics Systems, Inc. Anchor | green | “has chosen a course with a high barrier to reversal.” | 4 |
| 2 | Altx, Inc. v. United States | green | “must affirm a commission determination if it is reasonable and supported by the record as a whole, even if some evidence detracts from the commission's conclusion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.