2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from St. Louis Union Station Holdings, Inc. v. Discovery Channel Store, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Louis Union Station Holdings, Inc. v. Discovery Channel Store, Inc. Anchor | green | “the creation of a valid settlement agreement requires a meeting of the minds and a mutual assent to the essential terms of the agreement.” | 4 |
| 2 | Barry v. Barry | green | “district courts have inherent power to enforce a settlement agreement as a matter of law when the terms are unambiguous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.