4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Sanchez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Sanchez Anchor | green | “jurors are presumed able to understand and correlate instructions and are further presumed to have followed the court's instructions.” | 35 |
| 2 | People v. Centeno | green | “when attacking the prosecutor's remarks to the jury, the defendant must show that, 'in the context of the whole argument and the instructions' , there was 'a reasonable likelihood the jury understood or applied the complained-of comments in an improper or erroneous manner. in co…” | 23 |
| 3 | People v. Sanchez | green | “able to understand and correlate instructions and are further presumed to have followed the court's instructions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.