2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Anchor | green | “a group of persons associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct.” | 4 |
| 2 | Canyon County v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. | green | “to have standing under section 1964(c), a civil rico plaintiff must show: (1) that his alleged harm qualifies as injury to his business or property; and (2) that his harm was 'by reason of the rico violation, which requires the plaintiff to establish proximate causation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.