2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trotter v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trotter v. State Anchor | green | “juror must be an individual who actually sat on the jury and whom the either challenged for cause or attempted to challenge peremptorily or otherwise objected to after his peremptory challenges had been exhausted.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kochalka v. Bourgeois | green | “acknowledgment of bias in favor of one party-regardless of which party it was-should have disqualified her from serving on the jury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.