2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tankersley v. Durish.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tankersley v. Durish Anchor | green | “texas state courts have cited various provisions under ection 29 with approval when determining whether to apply collateral estoppel.” | 3 |
| 2 | Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. Trapnell | green | “the doctrine of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion is designed to promote judicial efficiency, protect parties from multiple lawsuits, and prevent inconsistent judgments by precluding the relitigation of issues.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.