2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bloch v. Frischholz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bloch v. Frischholz Anchor | green | “pattern of harassment, invidiously motivated.” | 4 |
| 2 | Wetzel v. Glen St. Andrew Living Cmty., LLC | green | “(1) she engaged in protected activity; (2) she suffered an adverse action; and (3) there was a causal connection between the two.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.