2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from DiPino v. Davis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiPino v. Davis Anchor | green | “f a point germane to the appeal is not adequately raised in a party's brief, the court may, and ordinarily should, decline to address it.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hunt v. State | green | “this is (hopefully) a unique class of cases.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.