2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parker v. Priest.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker v. Priest Anchor | green | “ballot titles must include an impartial summary of the proposed amendment that will give voters a fair understanding of the issues presented and of the scope and significance of the proposed changes in the law.” | 4 |
| 2 | Cox v. Daniels | green | “places the burden upon the party challenging the ballot title to prove that it is misleading or insufficient.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.