2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beeman v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beeman v. State Anchor | green | “another method of conducting a constitutionally valid search,” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Tipton | green | “the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.