2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nisselson v. Drew Industries, Inc. (In Re White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nisselson v. Drew Industries, Inc. (In Re White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.) Anchor | green | “the sole consideration should be whether, consistent with the requirements of rule 8(a), the complaint gives the defendant sufficient notice to prepare an answer, frame discovery and defend against the charges.” | 4 |
| 2 | Silverman v. Actrade Capital, Inc. (In Re Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd.) | green | “the question of 'reasonably equivalent value' ... is fact intensive, and usually cannot be determined on the pleadings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.