2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. Anchor | green | “proceedings should not be withdrawn for the sole reason that they are non-core.” | 4 |
| 2 | Schlein v. Golub (In Re Schlein) | green | “the purpose of the timeliness provision is to prevent unnecessary delay and stalling tactics.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.