2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. O'HARA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. O'HARA Anchor | green | “the crucial determination whether a particular residence complies with the requirements of the election law is that the individual must manifest an intent to reside there, coupled with physical presence 'without any aura of sham” | 4 |
| 2 | Diamondstone v. Connor | green | “the question of residence is a factual one, based on a variety of factors and circumstances” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.